Risk free rate adjustment

嗨,某些国家 /地区的无风险利率可以包含该国的默认期望(例如希腊或意大利),而A. Damodaran的讲座则具有调整程序。我们减去CDSspread or Default spread (dollar denominated) from the YTM of the 10 year country bond. He gives the example of Brazil and I was wondering is it applicable to other countries like Russia or Kazakhstan???
问题是:如果我国家的10年债券的YTM没有被广泛交易,并且仅接近基本利率和回购利率,我是否应该执行与Aswath Damodaran相同的程序?这对我来说没有意义,因为我不知道投资者是否首先将任何违约的期望提出来。请向我解释。

Comments (7)

最有帮助的
2020年1月21日 - 下午2:47
thebrofessor, 你怎么看?以下评论:

my gut would be use Aswath's procedure, because while no one likes to think about it, there are only a handful of countries that have a forgettable default risk, and Kazakhstan is not one of them.

another thing to consider is a comparative analysis of bond issues by other former USSR republics and/or middle eastern countries. I believe in the past 15 years Iraq, Egypt, Tajikistan, and others have all come to market. while your economics are different from them, it's a more useful comparison than Brazil, in my opinion.

Jan 21, 2020 - 2:54pm
marat258289, 你怎么看?以下评论:

but the risk free rate is a combination of inflation + real interest rate isn't it? if we assume the inflation of 5% and growth rate of Kazakhstan's GDP for real interest rate of 3.5-4% it equals the YTM of the 10 year bond. If I subtract theCDSspread, the cost of equity would understated, wouldn't it? In case of Brazil, he does that because the inflation + real rate is way lower than the YTM for 10 year gov't bond

2020年1月21日 - 下午2:56
marat258289, 你怎么看?以下评论:

因此,达马达兰(Damodaran)认为加价是为巴西所感知的国家违约率。我该如何衡量这种看法?换句话说,我怎么知道是否存在无风险利率的国家违约率?

Jan 21, 2020 - 4:15pm
thebrofessor, 你怎么看?以下评论:

in my opinion, the risk free rate is the rate a person earns on capital without being exposed to default risk, e.g. a 90 day treasury bill from the US, switzerland, and maybe japan/germany/UK, so I think you and I are just thinking about this differently.

in theory, some people call the 10y treasury bond of a country as growth + inflation (real GDP growth, that is) so yes, your equation works there. however, I'd argue that embedded within that is an inflation assumption, a term premium, and outside of the safe havens, default risk. so not apples to apples, my friend

2020年1月22日 - 6:53 AM
Rahma Dikhinmahas博士, 你怎么看?以下评论:

SED ut et modi quae。Ex perspiciatis eius laudantium et rerum dolorem nihil。

Impedit ea ab iure sed voluptas ipsa porro et. Sed error autem aut et. Blanditiis ratione nihil est aut. Et quo quod quia sit qui ipsum qui.

别名iure qui假设。Magnam Minima Architecto Perspiciatis Harum Deserunt UT。Quo Animi Aut Nihil Expedita Dolores Esse Eum Laboriosam。

Et distinctio alias quae quia. Ex id sunt excepturi officiis. Mollitia ut ipsam recusandae id quisquam est architecto rerum.

开始讨论

Career Advancement Opportunities

十一月ember 2022万博app网页版

  • Jefferies & Company(▲08) 99.6%
  • Lincoln International(= =) 99.3%
  • 金融技术合作伙伴(+ +) 98.9%
  • Bank of America Merrill Lynch(▲02) 98.5%
  • Evercore(▽02) 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

十一月ember 2022万博app网页版

  • PJT Partners(= =) 99.6%
  • Evercore(▲02) 99.2%
  • Greenhill(▲06) 98.9%
  • Canaccord Genuity(▲16) 98.5%
  • 威廉·布莱尔(= =) 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

十一月ember 2022万博app网页版

  • 普华永道公司融资(▲14) 99.6%
  • Lincoln International(▲03) 99.3%
  • Jefferies & Company(▲04) 98.9%
  • 威廉·布莱尔(▽02) 98.5%
  • Bank of America Merrill Lynch(▲04) 98.1%

总平均补偿

十一月ember 2022万博app网页版

  • 导演/MD(10) $ 613
  • Vice President (38) $392
  • Associates (216) $255
  • 第二年分析师(138) $163
  • 第三年+年分析师(19) $160
  • 1st Year Analyst (460) $153
  • 实习/夏季助理(88) $151
  • 实习/夏季分析师(333) $ 92