Curious to hear what area of finance people believe to be the least ethical (or moral). I don't think I am being bold in saying that there are plenty of shady "grey areas" in Wall Street's neck of the woods. While I am not smart enough to opine on the topic, thought I would leave it up to the forum to discuss. Thanks
**Note: I guess I am not really interested in specific one off cases, rather systemic/underlying issues
WSO Virtual BootcampsSee all
流行内容See all
Career Advancement Opportunities
August 2022万博app网页版
Overall Employee Satisfaction
August 2022万博app网页版
Professional Growth Opportunities
August 2022万博app网页版
Total Avg Compensation
August 2022万博app网页版
LeaderboardSee all
| 1 |
|
99.2 |
| 2 |
|
99.1 |
| 3 |
|
99.1 |
| 4 |
|
99.0 |
| 5 |
|
99.0 |
| 6 |
|
99.0 |
| 7 |
|
99.0 |
| 8 |
|
99.0 |
| 9 |
|
99.0 |
| 10 |
|
98.9 |
Related EventsSee all
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Comments (83)
Wall Street is very ethical given the fact that they are the most regulated industry in the US. I would say some areas of credit (distressed debt, direct lending, RX) can be very litigious and even unethical. In broader finance, predatory lending is as unethical as it gets.
Being regulated =/= being ethical. You could easily follow all regs and still be unethical.
you could also say an industry that is naturally ethical doesn't need to be regulated (or the inverse, the most unethical industries are the ones that require the most regulations)
Distressed debt / vulture funds hands down
Mike Milken would know
"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
- Learn more
- |Suggested Resource
Learn More300+ video lessons across 6 modeling courses taught by elite practitioners at the top investment banks and private equity funds -- Excel Modeling -- Financial Statement Modeling -- M&A Modeling -- LBO Modeling -- DCF and Valuation Modeling -- ALL INCLUDED + 2 Huge Bonuses.
Learn moreA lot of the public market, especially smaller cap companies and banks who sponsor SPACs in a sense act unethically. Some companies are elaborate stock promotions and for them to exist they need bankers willing to help themIPOor despac. There is so much money in the public markets and with many retail traders someone's getting scammed out there.
Any pharmaceutical company/product that Shkreli touched.
There's nothing Shkreli did that the big pharma guys aren't guilty of and get away with
HR and sustainability.
Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
100% the SPAC guys that take advantage of retail. It's sad seeing normal people lose money.
What do you mean by retail?
散户投资者是指“日常民间”。迪比卡lly investors with a net worth less than $1MM and annual income less than $250K (although these numbers slightly vary). Basically people who won't be able to recover from significant market losses.
大批
100%, anyone who "preys" on retail.
Will add the newsletter authors / Twitter gurus / promoters pumping shitty micro caps with guaranteed returns
I thought they are cracking down on individuals regarding this online?
AddCitadel and PFOFto that list then!
大批
投资银行家。特别是独立的赞助商，他们与员工一起做一些阴暗的事情
ESG，奇异地
确切地说，ESG只是左派将其理想学专业成为商业和文化的另一种法西斯工具。
ESG is a massive grift and a cover for authortarian consolidation. It is astroturfed as fuck and there are state actors pushing it behind the scenes.
It has very little to do with actually improving the world or helping anyone at all.
"Work ethic, work ethic" - Vince Vaughn
Correction here, it has nothing to do with improving anything and everything to do with consolidating power with capital managers that don't even have their own skin in the game.
How is investing in stocks that have a good environmental, social, and governance score worse than some of the other examples of immoral behavior in finance that cost people their jobs and livelihoods?
ESG is inherently a small government/conservative way to solve ethical issues in business. Generally the liberal approach would be government regulation and taxes while the conservative approach would be to let the free market solve it by not investing in those companies. But I guess it's evil because it makes people who donate to right leaning politicians a little tiny bit poorer!
Insider trading at Hedge Funds.
大批
10000000%的房地产。我能想到的合理的arguments for basically every other area of finance, but these guys are just the worst - especially the residential guys. Preying on people who just want to find a place to live, jacking up prices and rent figures to levels that far exceed "reasonable", rationing inventory into the market to create demand, the list goes on and on. Notwithstanding the fact that people who work in real estate are generally huge sleazelord shit bags to begin with.
Sleaziest I ever encountered were theNYC租赁代理。我可能经历了5个单独的诱饵，然后切换了地方的采访。他们躺在牙齿上，将竭尽所能获得经纪人的费用。
"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
It's not much different thanPEtbh.AcquiredEBITDA/ add on roll ups mean half the staff gets fired because synergies, or duopolistic sectors with insane pricing power increasing margins via price increases, etc. heard a couple groups bragging how they were able to use the cost input/inflation excuse to raise prices more than the price of the actual cost input increase
Sigh. It's always the guys who couldn't get intoIB（没关系精英IBlikeFTPartners) that have to resort to real estate. I feel bad for them, all they know how to do, even as a mid level employee, is browse zillow
Reminds me ofthis. Dude is literally an evil genius. Could be using this intelligence to cure cancer or something, instead is using it to jack up residential prices.
Seriously? You think the RE guys are worse than the derivatives people? At least real estate is real.
Your Internal Audit department would like a word with you . . .
Commodity trading
I'm surprised to see this here. Commodity markets are so massive that one would think that doing unethical items/transactions just wouldn't make sense. Can you explain this further?
yeah, I feel like if anything that commodity markets are good things since it allows products to go to market
Quant(ˈkwänt)n: An expert, someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing.
Glencore at the very least seems to have had a pervasive bribery thing going on.
ReadThe World For SaleJavier Blas和Jack Farchy撰写了一些狂野的例子。商品不受监管，并处理新兴和边境市场，在这些市场中，腐败更为普遍/需要完成交易。
IMO, gotta be the payday loan guys. They are effectively bankers for the lowest portion of our economic ladder, and take full advantage.
this is the 100% correct answer for 'low' finance work. Things like that are deceptive and make the poor stay poor instead of helping them rise out of it.
Quant(ˈkwänt)n: An expert, someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing.
Equity Research
Username checks out.
hahahhahahaha
"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
Anything where the business model hinges on non-compete clauses?
Crypto traders that pump and dump shitcoins. If it was any other security they'd all be in jail (for good reason)
债务购买者。一个例子是公开交易的PRA组。他们本质上是从其他公司购买美元的便士消费者债务，并精巧地收取债务的方式。很多时候，有诉讼威胁。这并不意味着我反对人们偿还债务和收款的必要工作，但应在道德上进行。这是Wiki的一些摘录：
Litigation[edit]
In 2014, theAttorney General of New Yorkobtained a settlement against PRA "for repeatedly bringing improper debt collection actions against New York consumers."14The case involved "uncontested default judgments" levied against defendants who failed to respond to suits brought by PRA against them.14和解要求放弃针对债务人（数百万美元）的索赔美元$300,000。142015年9月，债务购买行业的监管机构消费者金融保护局公开了对PRA的同意令，PRA在PRA 2015年的年度报告中详细介绍了SEC。作为同意令的一部分，PRA受到了罚款和罚款，并且由于各种可疑的债务收款惯例，必须向其一些客户赔偿。
Adverse regulatory actions[edit]
In September 2015, The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) ordered a subsidiary to pay $19 million in consumer refunds and an $8 million penalty, and stop collecting on over $3 million worth of debts. The CFPB found that the subsidiary:
Private equity is partially to blame for the destruction of the middle class and deindustrialization.
After them, payday lenders and other usurious institutions.
"Work ethic, work ethic" - Vince Vaughn
It is an really interesting point given that countries that have continued proud manufacturing (high tech and otherwise) like Japan and Germany both do not have as insanely largePEindustries as the US, everything else being equal. To go one further, I'd be curious to find out if there is a correlation between possible relative lack ofPEinvestment/ownership of Midwestern firms (where many Germans moved to and started businesses) and higher (formerly at least with pre-Rust Belt) manufacturing output.
Quant(ˈkwänt)n: An expert, someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing.
您只是在刮擦其表面，但是您的方向是正确的。
"Work ethic, work ethic" - Vince Vaughn
There is also far lower high-tech development in Japan and Germany. Software industry is a miniscule fraction of that of the US, and practically zero AI advancements fwiw. Failure to modernize their largest industries at the rate of the US, or call it slower advancement, has kept them locked in manufacturing, and I think that's a key part of the equation
如果有可能进行政权研究（也许是另一种研究更适用），我很感兴趣，看到制造产出的变化与金融赞助商从事制造业的公司的百分比，并将其除以地区（全球，美国（以及我们内部：中西部，东，西，南等），欧洲，apac）。
I would imagine that there could be trends both in the public markets being the number of companies listed on the NYSE that participate in manufacturing in the US, as well as among all registered companies in the United States.
我还很好奇是否有任何特定的财务赞助商（Blackstone, Carlyle,KKR) or activist shareholders (Starboard Value,Third Point, ValueAct, the greatly feared Elliott, or the mysterious andpetrifying Carl Icahn) that have made impact on manufacturing in the United States through board control or otherwise.
The word partially is doing a lot of work in that sentence. The rise of buyouts coincided with these trends but the causal effect wouldn't be very large I imagine. ThePEindustry just isn't big enough to be meaningful if you're talking about something as big as deindustrialization. There was also a paper that came out recently covered in The Economist that found that employment at firms declines after managers withMBAsare appointed which seems like a similar and more important factor thanPE.
Look to things like trade or skill-biased technological changes (computers and the Internet are better for2ManBetX登陆 for steel factory workers) instead. There's a rich econometric literature on this question.
I agree s921 If we're being empirical, the de-industrialization of the US is most closely attributable to international economic trade agreements and the relationships between currencies.PE, as well as public, operates within those boundaries and does what it will.
People go to payday lenders because regular banks will not lend to them. Thus the regular banks are to blame as well.
大批
Eh, not necessarilyIncomingIBDrejectwith freedom comes responsibility. We can't say the banks "should" be providing loans to people who likely will default naturally given their circumstances or purposefully default by just taking money without ever having the plan to pay it back. That's where payday loans come in and mainly their reason for being. They garnish wages through access to your bank account to pull the funds from the check automatically which essentially guarantees their repayment. Philosophically you could look at pay day loaners or "financiers" both negatively or positively. Negative if their interest rate is ridiculous like above 35% (or whatever % we collectively agree is too much) or you can view them positively because this market primarily serves those who are at the very bottom of society and have no other option for cash. It provides liquidity in the face of financial difficulty. They could be using that for starting a business of their own, unexpected medical bills, bills in general, who knows. Or, and more likely the case, using it to abuse drugs, alcohol, prostitution, gambling, whatever.
That's the thing about Capitalism, it's a system of organization. That's all it is. What we do to set up that system with the appropriate guard rails and how the actors of the system act across the spectrum of small time traders to large traders and those in power who regulate everybody in between, is all up to the morale of man. It's the most efficient and liberal (old definition) system for trade there can be. How we act within this system is our faulting, not the system's faulting.
So when you guys mention pay day loaners or account factoring shops that garnish wages and assets for a 30% interest rate (many times higher in the accounts factoring business loan space) who's to blame? Solve that one and we'll be much closer to an economy of purity rather than of grey area and at times corruption.
Sacklers, but that's not exactly finance. W/in finance, I kinda agree w the current rendition of ESG
Three examples come immediately come to mind that have not been mentioned yet and all are US based. The last two are not directly related to the finance industry.
1) Remittance/Money Transfer: There are companies charging 2.5% to 5%+ for transferring money out of the country. A vast majority of people using these services are the working poor who are just supporting their families from where they are from. The high cost overall is driven by greed and corruption in the value chain, so it's not 100% driven by the firms operating in the space but it's a sad situation. As an aside, this is where crypto or blockchain could really help.
2) Real estate. The amount of stories around local and state government official taking bribes and backdoor deals around development deals is staggering. Every time the FBI charges any state or local level government employee with any crime, it seems like it's almost always associated with the real estate industry. That's not to say that other industries do not produce bad actors but this one is the most apparent.
3) Pharma and FDA: Big pharma and the FDA might as well merge because they essentially operate as one entity. I'm going to elaborate further on this one because it's pretty infuriating how openly corrupt this relationship has become. It has resulted in the stifling of innovation and development of subpar, overpriced drugs.
Re: 3 most notably with Covid. So many other treatments and vaccines laughed off because they would not make Big Pharma rich.
似乎腐败和贪婪越来越糟。也许就是这样，但是仅仅因为特朗普追随这些团体媒体开始深入研究，并开始报告已经发生的这些事情。
大批
I've worked in the pharma industry directly for one of the large global players and I can tell you, there is definitely a need for reshaping that industry both in respect to innovation and regulation. It's pretty fucked up. Best advice to anybody is just to just learn basics of medicine. Start with the question "what class of drug is this that you're prescribing" then the next question should be "what is the mechanism of action of the drug" which basically means how does this work in my body? From there go home research the class of drug, the mechanism of action, and then the brand name he's likely prescribing which has been influenced by that company's sales representative. That's pharmaceuticals. Med device is a whole nother fuckin ball game.
ESG
yeah lol look up lithium mines. Not everything considered "green" is green after all...
Rosemont Seneca Advisors
Merchant Cash Advance. Basically legal loan sharking. Really interesting stuff and if you're on the Wall Street side you're making a killing.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2015-10-06/how-two-guys-lost-god-and-god-and-found-400万
How has crypto not been mentioned
shit is literally MLM. It's Mary Kay for bros
它是
大批
He's not the "least ethical", but like i think someone mentioned above Chamath has taken advantage of retail investors with his blatant self promotion / cult of personality / insane amount of CNBC, Bloomberg, etc. features. I know the overall tech market has taken a nosedive, but his de-spacs are some of the worst.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/06/07/the-pied-piper-of-spacs
Crypto/forex/sports betting/real estate and anything else that you see under the countless profiles of Insta scammers that look like the type of people you cover your drink around
Sports betting is a good one. I don't consider it "finance" but definitely a skeezy industry
发薪日贷款
anyone without skin in the game, which is 99% of finance.
if you wouldn't buy it for yourself and your grandma, you shouldn't be promoting it and may you get what's coming to you. this goes forPWM,PE,IB,AM, RE,VC, SPAC, crypto, lending, permanent life insurance agents, everybody. I think there's a special place in hell for those people (if there is a hell)
Operations - you spend all day looking at porn/jerking off
that's pretty sinful
并非严格的财务
担保人贷款
"if your credit score is really bad, get someone to vouch for you (pay if you default) and we'll give you a loan at 40% annual interest rate"
basically loan sharks
我有一个兼职翻译的电话a market where the company's subsidiary did this. People really often cried because it's usually friends screwing over friends or an indebted son puts down his retired grandpa as guarantor and the grandpa is actually really poor as well. The company also harasses people with regular phone calls if they're late on payment schedule and scares them with litigation.
“你签署了一份合同,如果你不付给我们,我们will go to the court and a notary will decide whether we can sell your house and collect our payments"
Absolutely heartbreaking. The founder of this company is a rags-to-riches story with a net worth of like $500m.
whats his name
Nulla enim officia aspernatur molestiae placeat et ut. Dolore repellendus excepturi sapiente qui laboriosam dolorem maiores minus. Quo consequuntur voluptatem corrupti porro dolorum repellat non aut. Fugiat nihil pariatur minus sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus:6 financial modeling lessons free($199 value)
orWant toUnlockby signing in with your social account?
Magni a tempore nam cupiditate est molestiae. Quasi officiis sunt illum et suscipit autem sed mollitia. Error quas sed illum et nihil qui ipsum explicabo.
Dolorum autem nisi aut modi illo. Nihil voluptatem quod autem ut fugit amet.
Quant(ˈkwänt)n: An expert, someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing.
Similique sit beatae sequi pariatur. Molestiae ipsa qui possimus est voluptatem. Iste ut aspernatur officia aut.
Culpa ex est qui asperiores. Et dolor odit ad repellat qui iste consequatur.
非voluptas cumque dolores ex neque。Maiores vel Quia Ipsa Recation tempore dolor公司。
Libero necessitatibus nihil ea ipsa occaecati ratione quisquam. Error id voluptatem ipsam. Blanditiis quae consectetur distinctio molestiae. Maiores assumenda dolorum beatae tenetur animi impedit quibusdam. Excepturi ea ad et soluta iusto est dicta quod. Exercitationem consequuntur voluptatibus adipisci qui ea.
Minima commodi architecto sed. Voluptas et quia ut mollitia.
大批