所以我在新兴市场，想去Fixed income path because比公平更好的工作生活平衡
I'm initially expecting thatfi是also plays withhyBond, but turns out here all PM allowed to buy is IG bond
The perception is IG bond is boring, but my thinking is but i'm in Emerging Market, so dealing with EM IG..
1）作为EM固定收益分析师的无聊吗？如果说EM Equity Analyst的得分是有趣的工作，那么得分是多少
2）Does it boring as EM Fixed Income PM? What's the score if say EM Equity PM score for interesting job is 10
WSO Virtual Bootcamps查看全部
职业发展机会
2023年1月万博app网页版
总体员工满意度
2023年1月万博app网页版
专业增长机会
2023年1月万博app网页版
Total Avg Compensation
2023年1月万博app网页版
Leaderboard查看全部
| 1 |
|
99.2 |
| 2 |
|
99.0 |
| 3 |
|
99.0 |
| 4 |
|
99.0 |
| 5 |
|
99.0 |
| 6 |
|
98.9 |
| 7 |
|
98.9 |
| 8 |
|
98.9 |
| 9 |
|
98.9 |
| 10 |
|
98.9 |
注释 （8）
这取决于
啊，我明白了。
有趣的是fianalyst in EM countries also have exposure to US IG company.. Nice to know about it.
因此，如果我可以得出结论，那么如果该人对宏更感兴趣，那么EM IG会更有趣？但是，如果该人更自下而上，EM权益对他来说会更有趣，对吗？
关于fianalysis, aren'tfianalysis also typically bottom up and use 3 statement modelling too? Only the ratiosfi分析师看到与股票分析师不同吗？
You are correct if you are assuming EM IG corporates whereas the big chunk of the market is EM IG sovereigns, hence the macro comment. Would also argue even if doing EM IG corporate there is a different flavor bc of interest rates, bond math etc
啊，我看到..对parahpase，fianalyst we'll be dealing with:
1）mostly EM soverign = macro based
2）Some EM IG corporate = bottom up
3）Some other US IG corporate = bottom up -> most boring one
So 3 statement modelling will be relevant on bottom up
对于EM Sovereign，我们通常执行什么样的分析？
有点：
——一般固定收益分析师specialize in one of US IG, EM sovereigns, EM corporates in addition to other stuff. Kind of like you have US large cap equity analysts, US small cap, EM equity etc.
- just to clarify i meant the market for EM sovereigns is bigger than EM corporates so they have morebondsoutstanding. Similarly US IG is actually way bigger than either of the others. It would be very unusual for one person to focus on all 3
- 主权是付款和债务可持续性分析的平衡（主要是macroeconomics）
啊，我明白了。Interesting.
关于sovereign do balance of payments and debt sustainability analysis, sofianalyst who specialise in Sovereign will be more like economist role?
年代之间overeignfi分析师和经济学家，他们的技能是否相似且可以互换？
If so, which one of the 2 is seen as higher prestige and pay?
是的，许多经济学家担任该角色。不是完全可互换的，但是很近，即股票和公司信用分析师。在里面economist在极端细节（增长，通货膨胀）的情况下，在主权分析师角色中，通常在高水平的角色中进行预测关键变量的角色econ预测并使用这些投入来提出投资建议。
I would say adjusted for equal level/seniority pay is probably better for sovereign fixed income analysts because it is a investment role where you are recommending positions vs. economists who don't typically do that.
Prestige is tough to say, but I think economists probably have more as chief economists are very high profile on TV etc, but among those "in the know" I think you'd be more impressed by a sovereignfixed income portfolio manager
Dolore non suscipit magni voluptatem. Quia repellendus non inventore et nobis et. Earum voluptatem possimus commodi expedita asperiores et. Fugiat vero rerum temporibus reprehenderit. Et aut deserunt delectus omnis corporis.
Suscipit adipisci rerum et nihil reiciendis。除外的Magni Magni Quia Quia Quia。Maxime官方adipisci坐着recusandae rerum。
Necessitatibus libero et sunt voluptates. Velit repellat voluptatem suscipit est omnis vel maiores. Perferendis rerum fuga non delectus voluptatem libero ullam.
id qui non et。Accusamus Magni opcudiandae官员Recatia Reactur Magnam。Accusantium duffuri iure挥发了atperiam。nostrum quaerat Laboriosam iusto et velit quis。
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus:6财务建模课程免费（$ 199的价值）
or开锁有了您的社交帐户...