RX排名2022-我们可以为学生带来好处和寻求横向的实习生的重组排名
Usually people love making rankings on banks but we don't really have any rankings posts for all theRX包括您的林肯，派珀（Piper）的商店raymond james,Miller Buckfire, imperial,tr，GLC，无畏等。
Oct 09, 2022
Oct 09, 2022
职业发展机会
2023年2月万博app网页版
-
Lazard Freres(+ +) 99.5％
-
Jefferies& Company(▽01) 99.1%
-
Lincoln International(▽01) 98.6％
-
金融技术合作伙伴(▽01) 98.1%
-
威廉·布莱尔(▲08) 97.7%
Overall Employee Satisfaction
2023年2月万博app网页版
-
Canaccord Genuity(▲04) 99.5％
-
威廉·布莱尔(▲04) 99.1%
-
Lincoln International(▲10) 98.6％
-
Stephens Inc(▲11) 98.1%
-
Jefferies& Company(▲06) 97.6%
Professional Growth Opportunities
2023年2月万博app网页版
-
Lazard Freres(▲15) 99.5％
-
金融技术合作伙伴(▲09) 99.1%
-
Lincoln International(= =) 98.6％
-
Jefferies& Company(▽03) 98.1%
-
威廉·布莱尔(▲01) 97.7%
Total Avg Compensation
2023年2月万博app网页版
-
Director/MD (6) $ 592
-
副总裁（25） $ 422
-
同事（138） $262
-
第三年+年分析师（9） $194
-
2nd Year Analyst (83) $172
-
第一年分析师（260） $171
-
实习/夏季助理（42） $166
-
实习/夏季分析师（186） $91
排行榜See all
| 1 |
|
99.2 |
| 2 |
|
99.0 |
| 3 |
|
99.0 |
| 4 |
|
99.0 |
| 5 |
|
99.0 |
| 6 |
|
98.9 |
| 7 |
|
98.9 |
| 8 |
|
98.9 |
| 9 |
|
98.9 |
| 10 |
|
98.9 |
评论 （54)
#1 Whichever firm you can get an offer from
#2 Doesn't matter
b
1.PJT
1A.HL/laz
1B.Evercore
1C.穆利斯,Centerview
。
大声笑它不会。rx大自然大部分出庭大声笑
- Learn more
- |Suggested Resource
Learn More300+ video lessons across 6 modeling courses taught by elite practitioners at the top investment banks and private equity funds -- Excel Modeling -- Financial Statement Modeling -- M&A Modeling -- LBO Modeling -- DCF and Valuation Modeling -- ALL INCLUDED + 2 Huge Bonuses.
Learn moreZ
以下是一些性能统计信息，而不是仅仅没有逻辑的猜想排名。这是债务人顾问的前十名第11章restructurings of 2020 - the largestYTDof the decade for restructurings, so far (omitted Thai Air and Digicel for non-Ch 11)
1. $ MOELIS -HERTZ（$ 240亿美元）
2. $Evercore - Frontier Communications ($22bn)
3. $PJT - LATAM Airlines ($18bn)
4. $ PJT -Intelsat（$ 170亿美元）
5. $Guggenheim-Ascena零售（130亿美元）
6. $Rothschild- Chesapeake Energy Corp ($12bn)
8. $ Evercore -McDermott（10亿美元）
9. $Lazard-Valaris（80亿美元）
11. $ Houlihan Lokey -Seadrill（70亿美元）
12. $Seabury - Norweigan Air ($7bn)
Generally, I think its reasonable to say all of the firms here do good work, and the repeat names (PJT 2x, EVR 2x) are repeat names for a reason
Broadly agree with your comment.
尼特·皮克（Nit-Picky），但霍利汉（Houlihanlink。EVR必须完成2017年ERA重组协议。
好接收 - 实际上是两项不同的交易。一个是Seadrill Partners一家英国公司，另一家是Seadrill Limited一家美国公司。Seadrill Limited拥有35％的Seadrill Partners资产，有点令人困惑。他们俩最终都提交了，但在不同的过程和时间表中。
Seadrill Limited was Houlihan, Seadrill Partners was Evercore.
accurate- Houlihan led the 2017 seadrill restructuring as well
Per RestructuringInterviews:
一级:PJT,Evercore,Houlihan Lokey（HL），Lazard，Moelis
第2层：Rothschild，Centerview，PWP,Jefferies, Ducera, Gugg
第3层：Miller Buckfire，绿色的山
对美国的真实
只是为了补充说，在欧洲，它看起来更像是这样：
一级:PJT,HL, RTH
第2层：Moelis，PWP，EVR，LAZ
Rest
不同意这一点-Moelis London拥有顶级RX在过去的几年中，老年人并履行了一些非常大的任务。团队也不是特别大。
在欧洲也是Lazard成为T1的案例。
B
莫re generally and inlooselyspecific order within tiers
第1级（按字母顺序排列，所以没人得到胸骨）：
Evercore,HL, Lazard, Moelis, PJT
2级：
Ducera、Centerview Guggenheim, Jefferies, Greenhill, PWP, Piper Sandler
第3层：
Miller Buckfire, Rothschild, Raymond James,Baird
第4层：
GLC Advisors, PJ Solomon
Tier 1 is self explanatory, the best restructuring banks that you'll see at least one of on every sizable mandate.
Tier 2 is mostly self explanatory with some notes that:
在第3层中：
Would push back on PWP a bit. Agree the group is still not close to recovered from Kramer revolt, but they've brought in some talent. Look at deals the last few years, feed off strength of healthcare relationships at the firm as well as TPH energy connections. Found a nice niche in those 2 areas, and in 19 had iHeart. Not a bad resume.
我第二。只有合法的T2是Centerview，Ducera和Perella（字母顺序）
极为基础。想知道为什么Piper TRS应该得到2级，因为我听说人们说Jeff比Piper强，而Piper是T3商店。与他们进行即将进行的采访，所以只想了解更多
第二。通过我的团队中的一些老年人在MDS上工作的一些老年人，听到了有关Piper的RX小组的糟糕事情。我相信也主要关注债权人方面。
撞
想知道为什么GLC放置在第4层中？他们似乎从我所看到的东西中出现了很不错的出口（橡树, L Catterton,Cerberus，顶级RX商店等）。员工似乎主要是Ugrad/Grad的顶级（Uchicago，沃顿酒店，乔治敦，斯特恩）。
Just checked Debtwire and saw that GLC had seven publicly announced mandates in 2020 and 2021 (compared to for example Jefferies which had 29 publicly-announced mandates in 2020-2021)GLC did pick up 4 YTD and one (Endo International) is legit
就尊重而言，我认为您是亲密的，但是您对Jefferies的说法使我认为您真的不知道自己在说什么。UCC分配很烂，因为您对交易的结构如何实际上或没有输入RXbanking). In most UCC assignments, your group has holdup value and you're looking to be as big a pain as possible so that someone will settle with you. By that time, the Company will have negotiated a potential plan with a主要利益相关者（可能会拧紧您的小组的计划），因此您只是想尽可能多地回避。即使您正在工作huge capital structure, you don't want to be working as UCC or Equity (usually).
Do you know what debtor deals Evercore has advised on recently? Asking because their website focuses on M&A and doesn't have an option to filter, and I don't have access to the league tables.
Talen Energy和Altera基础设施是今年最大的IIRC
有人对Baird的RX实践有任何了解吗？它是如此新，我无法找到太多。
碰到这个。也很好奇
B
全新，由一些以前的Guggs家伙创立
前米勒·B（Miller B）和兰加德（Lazard）高级人士；目前，这充其量是刚起步的。
嘲笑它
From Debtwire for FA's on number of US in-court deals with prepetition debt over $250m for 2021 (all roles):
1.HL
2. FTI（并不真正计算）
3.在拉扎德和罗斯柴尔德之间
5.穆利斯
6. Evercore
7. PJT Partners
如果您按债务规模排名HL, Rothschild, Lazard, Evercore, Moelis, PJT (excluding FTI here).
In any case, every time this thread comes up it's always the same names with people arguing who is "Tier 1" and "Tier 2" despite the fact that the industry is so small it's always the same 8-10 firms at the top competing against one another.
In court deals are not a good metric to rankrx银行IMO
删除
I just provided what took a couple mins to scrape. I wholeheartedly agree that it's not a holistic measure of rankings given that a lot of stuff being done especially in today's environment is going to be out of court, but it still is a good general view on rankings and a lot of people here are interested mostly in the in-court side of things anyways. Also as I said the names at the top don't really change a ton, you've got the guys doing a lot of fees / high quantum cap structures and then everyone else.
Thank you for this, does anyone have an outlook for the creditor side?
如果我不记得，此列表都是债务人债权人 - 认为这就是HL在上面
I interned inRXlast summer and think the bottom line is that if you are interested inRXyou will go and recruit for all of the top 8 groups or whatever. Then if you land only 1 offer (quite likely given the odds), you will take that group. If you are fortunate enough to land 2+ offers outside of the other exploding (relatively unlikely / don't know many this has happened to) then you obviously have to make a decision. As this thread alludes sometimes it will be clear PJT vs. Jeff etc. Otherwise just go where you like the culture / vibe and don't split hairs between EVR vsHLvs laz这很愚蠢。
Let's ask the Restructuring__ Insta page LOL
。
Is trs/piper a t2 or t3 shop? Seems like some think it's around the likes of gugg but some think worst
在terested as well
Dolores quia exercitationem quae velit eveniet est incidunt. Veniam quibusdam sit omnis nihil dolor ad laudantium. Architecto autem quo cupiditate ex quas. Magnam deleniti illum magnam velit minima velit mollitia. Dolorem autem unde repellendus dolor non.
查看所有评论 - 100％免费
WSO取决于每个人都知道某事时能够参与进来。解锁您的电子邮件并获得奖金：6 financial modeling lessons free($199 value)
或者Unlockwith your social account...
Hic velit libero nihil alias dolor. Voluptatem excepturi iure quos ea hic. Voluptatem repellat reiciendis itaque cumque modi.
一个ccusamus esse consequatur beatae veniam aut temporibus laboriosam. Dicta sint maxime quaerat sit qui harum. Odit ut delectus rerum quos corrupti voluptas. Sed accusantium reprehenderit molestias.
Dignissimos ea voluptatibus molestiae dolor voluptatum别名安置公司。adipisci耳朵debitis aut et id。recrechenderit et amet quasi hic hiC doluptas dolor et。Dolores Quasi锻炼dlectus sunt labore。
fuga rerum sequi voluptas voluptatem voluptas ut。临时Atque Est asperiores ut velit nihil officiis。Reiciendis Omnis Quis voluptas voluptatem。HIC Aut Nam Enim et Natus Eligendi Vel。Quam Fariale Libero Reactur Ex。Blanditiis Aut Enim Ut。
旁partia官员非dignissimos et delectus。Aut Molestiae Qui turema aperiam amet。Maiores nemo velit iure quae nobis saepe omnis。Quia Totam Qui et voluptate ut voluptatibus。
一个ssumenda quis eveniet quo voluptatibus non et harum. Autem occaecati sit voluptatem nisi quis omnis. Adipisci cum voluptas in quos officiis aut a. Quibusdam voluptas odio inventore a ut. Atque laudantium eligendi rem atque atque vel.