2018年9月27日
2018年9月27日
WSO Virtual BootcampsSee all
Popular ContentSee all
职业发展机会
2023年2月万博app网页版
-
Lazard Freres(+ +) 99.5%
-
Jefferies & Company(▽01) 99.1%
-
Financial Technology Partners(= =) 98.6%
-
Lincoln International(▽02) 98.1%
-
William Blair(▲09) 97.7%
Overall Employee Satisfaction
2023年2月万博app网页版
-
Canaccord Genuity(▲04) 99.5%
-
William Blair(▲04) 99.1%
-
Lincoln International(▲10) 98.6%
-
Stephens Inc(▲11) 98.1%
-
Jefferies & Company(▲06) 97.6%
Professional Growth Opportunities
2023年2月万博app网页版
-
Lazard Freres(▲15) 99.5%
-
Financial Technology Partners(▲09) 99.1%
-
Lincoln International(= =) 98.6%
-
Jefferies & Company(▽03) 98.1%
-
William Blair(▲01) 97.7%
Total Avg Compensation
2023年2月万博app网页版
-
Director/MD (6) $592
-
副总裁（26） $422
-
同事（138） $262
-
第三年+年分析师（9） $194
-
1st Year Analyst (260) $171
-
2nd Year Analyst (84) $170
-
Intern/Summer Associate (42) $166
-
Intern/Summer Analyst (189) $91
LeaderboardSee all
| 1 |
|
99.2 |
| 2 |
|
99.0 |
| 3 |
|
99.0 |
| 4 |
|
99.0 |
| 5 |
|
99.0 |
| 6 |
|
98.9 |
| 7 |
|
98.9 |
| 8 |
|
98.9 |
| 9 |
|
98.9 |
| 10 |
|
98.9 |
评论 （80)
如果有人认为这些指控是真正的必要性，那就是为我们所有人提供帮助并跳出高窗口。这些控告者说过“我不确定30年前的细节，直到我最近与律师一起在一个房间里度过了6天，”显然，这些“律师”是激进律师，他们无所作为但是，将故事带入人的头脑，直到他们自己自己相信。谁真正地收购了基本上是“我太醉了，无法回想起任何细节，但我记得那是X人，而hip的推力是拉起裤子。”它只是弥补了任何在思想上不愿相信的人的尖叫。
Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say@shitwsosays
Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne
嗯. .我想是包容
Un-biased review with plenty of quantifiable evidence. Thanks.
I don't believe her one bit. BUT to be honest, I was scared after originally hearing her speak. Then comes DA MAN... AKA Heavyweight Justice Kavanaugh with the KNOCK OUT punch. What a testimony.
Lindsey Graham is also a new found legend. WOW!
林塞•格雷厄姆(Lindsey Graham) killed it.
- Learn more
- |Suggested Resource
Learn More300+ video lessons across 6 modeling courses taught by elite practitioners at the top investment banks and private equity funds -- Excel Modeling -- Financial Statement Modeling -- M&A Modeling -- LBO Modeling -- DCF and Valuation Modeling -- ALL INCLUDED + 2 Huge Bonuses.
Learn moreAbsolutely. That was beautiful.
Lindsey Graham came off as batshit insane and hypocritical. How can ANY Republican say this: "All I can say is that we're 40 days away from the election, and their goal - not Ms. Ford's goal - is to lay this past the midterms so they can win the Senate and never allow Trump to fill this seat"?
This is verbatim what the GOP did with Merrick Garland. Among the conservatives on this site, do any of you care to defend/explain this? Why is "the American people have a right to vote on SCOTUS nominees, if indirectly" a valid defense against appointing a moderate Merrick Garland but completely out of line for Kavanaugh?
So, Graham is bad because for once in his life he said the truth? I know you liberals think conservatives are dumb, but do you really think everyone is completely retarded and doesn't see what's going on?
Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
The obvious difference here is the GOP simply refused to vote, whereas Graham is accusing the Dems of ruining someone's life by using these allegations for their own political motives. The latter, if true, is obviously worse.
这并不意味着我仍然对共和党对Garland所做的事情感到愤怒。我是一个可能，如果投票，可能会选择Gorsich而不是Garland。但是在我看来，目的绝不能证明手段的正当性。参议院的共和党人滥用了权力，拒绝履行宪法义务，以使合格的候选人拒之门外。他们围绕《宪法》的意图努力，以适应自己的议程，并对美国神圣机构造成了长期损害。我并不是说这会证明这是一个政治绝技的合理性，但是在他们打开潘多拉的盒子后，我也不能同情自己。
No, it is fundamentally different. The Senate has the explicit power to ignore any nominee a President puts forward. The minority party doesn't have the explict right to push forward pastys in a ridicilous ploy to try and run a nomination into the ditch. The hilarious part of this whole thing is that the democrats just got done complaining the republicans pulled a nuclear option to pass something. A thing the democrats created in the previous administration.
Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say@shitwsosays
Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne
hell yeah he did bro
I'm not sure the allegations even need to be true at this point. Does this man look like someone qualified to be a Supreme Court justice? He's been on a partisan rant for the better part of an hour, and isn't shy about it. I understand the Court is politically polarized, but it beggars belief that anyone is considering putting someone into a lifetime appointment who has just spent 45 minutes saying "I'm not a judge, I am a Republican, and Democrats are going to reap what they've sown once I'm on the Court." The man is patently unfit for duty.
And all of this, of course, with GOP Senators making the unbelievably hypocritical spectacle of claiming that their nominee is being unfairly attacked for partisan reasons. That anyone can say with a straight face that shit like this happens only to Republicans, and not Democrats, is absurd. Al Franken resigned for much lesser reasons recently. And Merrick Garland certainly has something to say about the borderline-illegal politicization of the SCOTUS nominee process.
And by the way, I can remember details like hooking up with someone at a frat party, without being able to tell you what frat was hosting. Anyone who claims that they have a perfect memory is lying, while it's perfectly within the realm of possibility to remember a traumatic event in detail without remembering the contextual minutiae
I believe these allegations are false and political. That being said, I think Kavanaugh's temperament really hurt him today, in terms of being fit for a supreme court position. I understand how angry he is and I would act in a similar way, however, I believe it may end up providing hesitant Republican's an excuse not to vote for him. Anyone who believes these allegations are true and not political is an absolute fool.
"He shouldn't be mad at being accused of being a gang rapist, rather composed and sterile." Literally the worst argument ever made in the history of the fucking universe, and making me seriously rethink my position on whether to use the word "libtard."
She seemed credible and he seems credible. However, his defiance, defensiveness and arrogance is a bit much. He yelled and mocked people asking questions, these are the same people who will be voting for or against his confirmation. A much better strategy would have been to just answer the questions in a calm and respectful way.
http://www.series7examtutor.com
To be fair... he was called a gang rapist.
Yes, but the senators were referencing the third accuser's statements. Swetnick implied that he had a role in gang rapes.
http://www.series7examtutor.com
在切线上，您看到这些参议员多大了吗？Leahy是定期限制的理想案例。
Chuck Grassley is 7 years older than Leahy.
Lump him in too.
I think that most of us can agree that term limits are a good idea.
http://www.series7examtutor.com
He's not fit to be on the SCOTUS...like a poster above said, you don't want anyone who said they have a revenge campaign planned on the Supreme Court.
I can't blame the guy. The dems may have inadvertently pushed Kav farther to the right than when he started.
That is like... literally the opposite of non-partisan and unbiased if so..
So what you're saying is that a Supreme Court justice is allowed to be biased and overtly political if his feelings have been hurt? You do understand the purpose of the Supreme Court, and well, any judgeship at all, right?
他几乎说，这次听证会（顺便说一句，这是参议院提名听证会的重点）使他对民主党人有敌对。您能想象您是否正在审判，然后走进法院，法官说他明确不会因为...嗯，什么都不会给您公正的审判吗？也许他不喜欢缩写SC，因此他将偏爱反对@spin控制的案件。
The whole thing is bonkers and it's sad that partisanship is so bad that most of the Senate is going to vote for this clearly unqualified individual because they think he might overturn Roe vs Wade or something. I mean... there must be a hundred conservative judges who will vote the same way as Kavanaugh - just nominate one of them!
如果他担任这个职位，他需要公正。您不希望坐在这样的位置上的情感女歌。理想情况下，他们会因成为一个寒冷而计算的决策者而享有盛誉。
奇怪的是，卡瓦诺（Kavanaugh）认为他是安全的，因为没有什么能阻止共和党人确认他。我猜他正在依靠Dems，再也不会控制国会。
I thought polls were suggesting that dems are favored for the midterms
如果你看看历史和过去的中期选举,演示crats have a better chance of winning, so that might come back to haunt him. But at the rate this is going, Kavanaugh should be confirmed before November. Honestly, Ford may have some credibility, but there's absolutely no doubt that this move is political.
Dems need a 2/3 majority to impeach. Even if they gain substantial seats, it's very unlikely they'd ever gain a 2/3 majority.
Statistically, about 95% of sexual assault allegations are true. (It is possible that this one is not true) Why would a professor lie about sexual assault? The risk for her would be jail time. Why would she want to take that risk? About 2/3 of sexual assaults do not get reported for a variety of reasons.
http://www.series7examtutor.com
Idk maybe she believes herself because she's a psycho super liberal? Either that or the DNC is putting a million bucks in her piggy bank.
Would you accept $1,000,000 but take the risk of going to jail? I definitely would not take the risk..
http://www.series7examtutor.com
What is more likely, that she is a "psycho super liberal" who decided that she was going to make life difficult for a random judge, or that Brett Kavanaugh, who by all accounts is a heavy drinker, just blacked out about the night he sexually assaulted her. I'd bet most members of this site have nights where they have hazy-to-nonexistent memories, and Brett Kavanaugh is almost certainly no exception.
Plus... none of this came up around Neil Gorsuch. If this is all a liberal plot, why is it being so selectively applied?
This 95% stat being bandied about is absolutely absurd.
您怎么能说95％的索赔是正确的？
Do 95% of people who are accused of rape/harassment found guilty?
这是一个令人难以置信的愚蠢统计数据，不断地束缚而没有佐证。
Lying about assault, and being wrong about details of an assualt are two entirely different thing.
Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say@shitwsosays
Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne
Statistically you just 100% made up a number.
You told me to speak to a lawyer higher up on the thread.
I would ask you to speak to a law student at any decent school, and pose the question: should that 95% true statistic be used to assume guilt? Yes, yes, it's not an actual trial. That is such a dangerous path to take and a perversion of the justice system.
Just want to drop this in now, my money is that Kavanaugh makes it through. This whole thing is looking more and more like a ruse.
After that revolting performance Kavanaugh should not be confirmed. He is unfit for office.
我担心党派(他调查d the Vince Foster conspiracy theory) and legal judgement (he doesn't think Presidents should be investigated in office and may think they should be able to pardon themselves) before. Blasey's accusations, while possible, had a lot of holes.
Now I think Kavanaugh is an angry partisan, and pretty likely was a drunk groper (p.s. he's not accused of rape). Why is he (and the GOP) refusing an FBI investigation? Stepnick's claims match up with his own calendar timeline and she claims to have multiple witnesses, but GOP wants to vote without hearing her out or investigating it. There is no credible reason for this except fear of discovery.
How the hell does he expect to be taken as a fair arbiter when he just shat out a bunch of partisan GOP nonsense rather than trying to defend himself on the facts (which I thought might actually favor him in the Blasey case)?
这个人应该做到，他证明自己不适合法院。如果他的提名在没有调查Stepnick/Blasey主张的情况下通过
Omnis Modi Aliquam分裂Ea Qui eius Omnis。quaerat voluptatem est molestiae偶数偶数倾向。Expedita Odit Nihil Voluptatem Cumque。Enim Rem Esse Animi Rounderi Ea。Velit EOS Deserunt Quidem dolor Impedit Reactur suscipit。
Quibusdam doloribus ipsam et vero nulla. Debitis ducimus non fuga dolorum quo repellendus repudiandae. Facilis laboriosam ea non nobis eum provident. Animi qui ut voluptas laudantium maxime id labore sunt. Ea excepturi quia voluptas voluptatibus voluptates est.
Excepturi et ex eum maiores voluptas velit quas. Ipsa rem sed voluptas eum voluptatibus alias exercitationem eligendi. Magni excepturi quia laboriosam ipsa eum sapiente corrupti facilis. Saepe quia voluptates sed tenetur quis. Non distinctio fugit repellat unde similique vero sint molestiae.
Quod quia ipsam earum magnam aut quia. Suscipit corrupti iure delectus sunt tenetur modi. Qui eum distinctio ea quibusdam veritatis. Deleniti ut sed nihil. Enim consectetur magni quia quaerat quibusdam alias quia. Perferendis exercitationem non optio accusantium omnis qui. Rerum ad rerum ut rem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus:6 financial modeling lessons free($199 value)
orUnlockwith your social account...
http://www.series7examtutor.com
Dignissimos deserunt est molestiae误差。Sunt et et et ut et quod quaerat non。Recususandae Quis est Commodi asperiores qui Magnam Abaustenda。ET在Magnam opudiandae Aut。发明人Est ex cum nona。ET IPSAM中的颞叶。Earum Illo Amet Abaveenda dolore animi non est。
Reprehenderit vitae placeat dolor quos nostrum dolore. Et et repellat cumque aspernatur nostrum consequatur sed. Ea voluptas et eveniet occaecati voluptatem et.
Sit optio eos ipsam quasi esse. Quo eius non eum. Tempora ipsa consectetur sunt sit ducimus quo.
Eligendi quasi harum culpa fugit porro et fugit. Ipsa perferendis saepe consequatur exercitationem sit velit vel ut. Commodi eum possimus quam quos veniam dolores. Omnis suscipit voluptatem enim quas et aliquam voluptatem.
Vel consectetur est aut aspernatur dolores molestias. Esse soluta autem sunt molestiae nam explicabo aut quia. Nulla esse sapiente molestiae mollitia voluptate. Quisquam sed ut numquam ipsa deserunt ipsum sed.
Et et amet voluptatem tempore quo. Et id quidem iusto sit culpa nemo eum voluptatem. Animi minima molestiae praesentium maxime commodi. Repellat voluptatem perferendis incidunt libero veritatis voluptate possimus. Totam ipsum molestias eaque ut assumenda sed dolores.