来自具有PE背景的H / S招募的单身经理 - 他们是否关心完成PE计划 /戒烟来做其他事情,直到上学开始?
如果我想加入高度表或者a Cat Rock or an Alkeon or a Viking type fund out of Harvard /斯坦福大学MBA,MBB+ UMMPEMBA前背景:
那些公司是否会辞职,如果我辞去了2年的ummPEAssociate program now (school starts August / September) to go work at an early-ish stage startup?
我相信大多数招聘经理都会知道我的PEprogram was a 2-year program (像伯克希尔一样坚定/GTCR/ WCAS) and that I'm breaking my standard 2-year commitment. But I want to join a flaming hot startup (backing from LSVP / Sequoia / KPCB /加速类型)作为早期(#1-5)商业雇用。这家初创公司是在我无法停止思考的领域中,并花费大量时间与内部的人们交谈(包括在我分析过股票投球的公共竞争对手中)。
My story would be, look, this company is a mover and a shaker in the space, I love their sector, and I couldn't say no. I already did 4+ deals while inPE, I wasn't learning more, and yea, I broke my promise to stay as an Associate for 2 years, but you know what, I learned方式方式more this way, and I took a gamble on my career because I wanted to chart my own path and believe it will pay off.
想法?
评论 (24)
Bruh Cat Rock和Alkeon不是Viking Altimeter Calibre
Yea I just threw out the first SMs that came to mind, I hope the question / context still generally makes sense
Alkeon处于同一级别的IMO。非常低估,在雷达公司之下。
如果我错了,请纠正我,但你离开了MBB几年后to go toPE然后离开PE一年后,在一家初创公司工作不到一年,然后上商学院然后在对冲基金会工作?似乎有很多弹跳。如果您对初创公司的这个机会真的很感兴趣,那么为什么要去对冲基金(更不用说商学院)?我只会选择一条路并承诺。另外,您提到的对冲基金正在追求根本不同的策略。
要澄清,3yMBB+ 2yPE是标准的MBApath
我建议3岁MBB+ 1.5yPE+ 0.5 in startup作为preMBA
广泛的笔触想法是1)我有兴趣尝试一下,认为这会很酷,并且不想浪费我MBA关于此的实习,2)认为我还要多6个月才能学到PE
如果我能做我想做的事(主要原因),然后仍然招募,这确实是一个您的事和饮食问题HFpostMBA.
300+ video lessons across 6 modeling courses taught by elite practitioners at the top investment banks and private equity funds -- Excel Modeling -- Financial Statement Modeling -- M&A Modeling -- LBO Modeling -- DCF and Valuation Modeling -- ALL INCLUDED + 2 Huge Bonuses.
了解更多I don't think there is one right answer here, but staying at thePEfirm for the full 2 years seems like the right call if you are serious about working at a hedge fund long-term. Joining a startup for half a year may make you seem fickle/ not committed to investing, and I doubt that one could make a worthwhile impact in that short amount of time. If you want to test the waters at this startup with the potential to ride it out then by all means give it a shot.
去做就对了。我在1B+ SMHF(显然不是维京/高度计)并帮助领导招聘,故事对我们来说是有意义的。这仅有6个月,而且您的遗憾和遗憾的几率似乎都很高。
我唯一想的是这是否会影响您的参考
我觉得没有完成2年会有所伤害。但是我认为您应该尝试这家初创企业。听起来您真的很兴奋,我觉得如果您从不尝试
等待,所以您只想在创业公司工作6个月?
You're saying you want to take a gamble and chart your own path but you're already planning on leaving, no?
As a pre-MBA internship / externship. It might have been worth noting in the premises of the post that these are not that uncommon. Often you email a founder and they know the drill - in for 6 months to do some project(s) like stand up a new vertical GTM, new pricing strategy, lead a fundraising process, etc.
哦好的。只是好奇它如何适应您的长期职业目标,因为您想去HFafter
您已经披露的数量有限 - 我认为您是典型的声望chaser,即做某事,因为它在简历上听起来不错,而不是因为您实际想要。这没什么错 - 我发现,在职业生涯的早期,大约有75%以上的人就是这样。
这是在您20多岁时发展的重要性,因此 - 我建议您退出PE并尝试这家初创公司,而不必担心老虎或其他任何招聘的光学。尝试新事物以查看您是否辜负自己的承诺是一件好事,可以帮助摆脱这种行为,因此我会说继续尝试新事物,直到找到新事物为止。越早发现它,越好。
谢谢。是的,我是典型的声望追逐者100%。我很难摆脱这种心态。这是我第一次找到东西,我想,这是蜜蜂的膝盖。我会再考虑一下您的评论,但这是一个很好的思考食物。我对工作的兴趣HF只是相同的钱 +声望追逐 +它似乎是一个更好的版本PEwhich makes for an ok job I suppose but not too particularly stimulating outside of an occasional kernel of exciting research.
Sounds like you might enjoy this startup more比对冲基金(not a bad thing, just an observation). Hedge fund not a great job for most people anyways.
Not to derail your post, but why did you choose to recruit with 3yr atMBB而不是2?这对招聘人员有很大的不同吗?您如何在UR基金与前银行家进行?你能得到的地方PE来自Apo/KKR/SLP/WP/TPG/CVC, ETC。
感谢您的帮助,希望您能为您的即将到来的决定好运。
Hey - If I can offer my thoughts...I am at aHF类似于您上面列出的内容。我加入了我的HFbefore completing the 2 yearPEprogram. That's to say that nobody cares if you did 1.5 years or 2 years. So long as you have the skills to succeed in this new job (which I figure you do, if you know how to do some basic modelling + thinking about companies). Is the extra 6 month experience at a startup useful? I would almost certainly say yes. If you are targeting a crossover fund doing public and pvt.... it's a no brainer that this would be an add to your skillset, not a detractor.
什么会你的球关于为什么操作经验会为跨界(或任何其他)基金增加价值?
任何人都会喜欢能够从以前从事初创公司的人评估公司的能力。或与创始人更好地联系以赢得交易。无论是什么,这都是启动方式的独特视角。做得好,不好的事情。当然,这不是一个有害的技能。
Quae rerum excepturi aspernatur at earum ipsa minus. Quo non maiores illo doloremque. Minima itaque officiis commodi omnis repellendus voluptatem labore dolor.
ISTE在Cumque Sint Aut。Inventore Culpa中的Poruptatibus Pariatur Reiciendis et。Esse nihil sint et sit pariatur quibusdam。Vero Quo Sint Veniam Voluptatum。Eaque Cumque Sit Omnis Atque。
查看所有评论 - 100%免费
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus:6 financial modeling lessons free($199 value)
或者Unlockwith your social account...