JPM Fixed Income revenue

Looking through theJPMearnings release today, I noticed their Fixed Income revenue for Q1 2010 was $5.4 billion, higher than their Fixed Income performance in any quarter last year. However, their Fixed IncomeVARhas dropped dramatically. Their best performing quarter last year was Q3 with $5 billion revenue andVARof 182, however their Q1 2010 Fixed IncomeVARwas only 69.

How was it possible for them to make so much money while reducing risk by such a significant amount?

Interested to hear from some of the traders out there.

Comments (12)

Best Response
12y
IlliniProgrammer, what's your opinion? Comment below:

I thinkVARis a statistical measure based on volatility; your expected returns on the 2nd worst day out of 1000 assuming a normal distribution of returns. In other words, if your volatility goes down massively (it's pretty low right now relative even to 2009 Q3 and definitely 2009 Q1), yourVARgoes down, too.

VARis a decent measure of short-term risk but not quite the same measure of longer-term fundamental risk. IfJPMhas breakdowns on what they own, I'd recommend comparing asset classes (high yield vs. high grade debt) and how much they own, net-net, of each. I'm willing to bet the numbers will be higher than in Q3.

Disclaimer: Trading strategies guy and former analytics guy. Not a trader.

12y
ShreddiesBrah, what's your opinion? Comment below:

I know whatVARmeans. Volatility leads to wider bid-ask spreads and hence whytradingrevenue is somewhat correlated to it. With reduced volatility and contracting bid-ask spreads, my question is how were they able to perform so well in Fixed Income? Unless more of it comes from proptrading, I don't see how it would be possible. It's not like the yield curve has gotten any steeper either. I'm sure there's a simple answer ...

至于打破Fixed Income down into high-yield vs Investment grade, I don't see how that would help answer the question. Both products purely take on duration risk afaik.

  • 2
12y
IlliniProgrammer, what's your opinion? Comment below:
Brown_Bateman:
I know whatVARmeans. Volatility leads to wider bid-ask spreads and hence whytradingrevenue is somewhat correlated to it. With reduced volatility and contracting bid-ask spreads, my question is how were they able to perform so well in Fixed Income? Unless more of it comes from proptrading, I don't see how it would be possible. It's not like theyield curve has gottenany steeper either. I'm sure there's a simple answer ...

至于打破Fixed Income down into high-yield vs Investment grade, I don't see how that would help answer the question. Both products purely take on duration risk afaik.

A lot of analysis is typically done on both credit risk and rates risk by risk management- and most firms have that data and the capability of doing a position-by-position analysis on Credit01, IR01, RAC, etc. I would imagine that both Credit01 and IR01 or one of their derivatives would factor into calculatingVAR, though I've never worked in risk management. Most fixed income productscarry信贷和利率风险,所以我认为一个好的风险量ure is probably going to factor in both.

As for the vol vs. income, I'm not a trader, but most of us studied econ. If there's a sudden catastrophic event that reduces the number of suppliers (in this case, of liquidity), and that catastrophic event abates, do suppliers come back immediately, or do they take time to come back?

Put another way, let's say that the federal government mandates the bulldozing of all coal-based power plants. Six months later, it lifts the ban. Do electricity prices fall immediately or does it take a while for new businesses to form and new power plants to spring up? Bear in mind that there are significantbarriers to entryfor a fixed income clienttradingfranchise; they don't just spring up overnight.

If I weren't already heavily exposed to the capital markets, I'd be snapping up broker/dealers and financial intermediaries like crazy right now. This will beprobablybe a very good economic cycle for the survivors- I'm just not sure how long the cycle will last while we're only a little over halfway through asecular bear market.

12y
ShreddiesBrah, what's your opinion? Comment below:
IlliniProgrammer:
As for the vol vs. income, I'm not a trader, but most of us studied econ. If there's a sudden catastrophic event that reduces the number of suppliers (in this case, of liquidity), and that catastrophic event abates, do suppliers come back immediately, or do they take time to come back?
Don't see how that explains how they made more profit this year. Unless I misunderstood you, surely, that would lead to less profit in Fixed Income? i.e. 2009, suppliers down (Lehman, Bear etc), other banks not willing to take risk on (UBS,MS) hence prime time to make profit from widening spreads while gaining market share, but in Q1 2010, bothMSandUBSet al were active once again in Fixed Income and bid-ask spreads were reduced, so wouldn't that meanJPMmakes less as they lose some of that market share they picked up easily in 2009?
  • 2
12y
ShreddiesBrah, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Well, they group Currencies and Commods under Fixed Income when reporting revenue, but theVARfigures are broken down further.

If you look at page 11 of this though http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ONE/891891724x0x365100/6bc0ae53-12b6-4ab5-815a-1ab1f522c5e2/1Q2010-Supplement.pdf

you'll notice that FX and CommoditiesVARdidn't change much in Q1, but Fixed IncomeVARwas reduced significantly.

If you look at the Fixed IncomeVARfor 2009 and compare it to revenue on page 9, you'll see the correlation between theVARand the revenue generated in Fixed Income for the four quarters last year, but that correlation seems to have been broken completely in Q1 2010.

  • 2
12y
Megashite Trader, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Bid-offer spreads HAVE narrowed - massively. Look at swap bid/asks; gone from something like 4-5bps post Lehman to sub-1bps (pre-crisis levels). Credit bid/asks have come in massively also. I think the biggest reason is what post #1 referred to. LEH bankruptcy just jumped out of the 500 day VaR models, most widely used industry wide I believe. Could also be down to greater prop positioning but I'd question the extent to which this has led to such epic revenues being posted.

12y
IlliniProgrammer, what's your opinion? Comment below:
Megashite Trader:
Bid-offer spreads HAVE narrowed - massively.Look at swapbid/asks; gone from something like 4-5bps post Lehman to sub-1bps (pre-crisis levels). Credit bid/asks have come in massively also. I think the biggest reason is what post #1 referred to. LEH bankruptcy just jumped out of the500 day VaRmodels, most widely used industry wide I believe. Could also be down to greater prop positioning but I'd question the extent to which this has led to such epic revenues being posted.
I briefly remember hearing the bid-ask spreads were pretty crazy when the world was ending in Sept. and Oct 2008, but can you comment on bid/ask spreads from Q3 2009?
12y
Jimbo, what's your opinion? Comment below:

"bid/ask spreads from Q3 2009?"

back to normal but the desks are much more concerend about charging correctly for credit and/or funding

12y
marcellus_wallace, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Did you expect a top 4 US bank, to not report amazingFIearnings when the Fedis loaning them money at 0.0%.

Find an Exonn orHF(with exceptional credit), loan them 500mm over 6 months at 2.2%, borrow from fed at 0.0%. Repeat 5 times, Bammoney market traderis done for the year he can go sleep. Ofcourse its not that simple, but its also not super difficult.

12y
Megashite Trader, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Expedita iusto itaque laudantium necessitatibus. In ducimus labore voluptatem non enim et ea. Quidem et nostrum sit nesciunt assumenda qui quisquam eius.

Ad minima reprehenderit ipsam non nam. Ea ex aut sunt et consectetur. Magni et eum hic sequi dicta sit. Qui excepturi eos amet non vel nobis et consequatur.

Distinctio quidem delectus harum quasi tempora corrupti. Sed dolor est culpa ex quaerat. Reiciendis adipisci possimus qui corporis fuga expedita dolorem. Voluptatem itaque enim quia molestiae beatae. Qui aut corporis est voluptatibus. Est eius est at illo ducimus deleniti eligendi. Pariatur iste ad sit doloribus voluptatibus mollitia quia.

Dolores exercitationem ex occaecati voluptatem. Deserunt voluptas doloribus quo eos cupiditate non. Qui saepe nihil eos quis sed nesciunt perferendis.

Start Discussion

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2023万博app网页版

  • Lazard Freres(+ +) 99.5%
  • Lincoln International(= =) 99.1%
  • Jefferies & Company(▽02) 98.6%
  • Financial Technology Partners(▽01) 98.2%
  • William Blair(▲10) 97.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2023万博app网页版

  • William Blair(▲04) 99.5%
  • Lincoln International(▲11) 99.1%
  • Canaccord Genuity(▲17) 98.6%
  • Stephens Inc(▲10) 98.1%
  • Financial Technology Partners(▲04) 97.7%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2023万博app网页版

  • Financial Technology Partners(▲05) 99.5%
  • Lincoln International(▲01) 99.1%
  • Lazard Freres(▲13) 98.6%
  • Jefferies & Company(▽03) 98.1%
  • William Blair(▲02) 97.7%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2023万博app网页版

  • Director/MD (6) $592
  • Vice President (27) $425
  • Associates (141) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (9) $194
  • 2nd Year Analyst (86) $170
  • 1st Year Analyst (263) $171
  • Intern/Summer Associate (45) $165
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (193) $92

LeaderboardSee all

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
银行onBanking's picture
银行onBanking
99.0
4
pudding's picture
pudding
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
6
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
MidMarketMcLovin's picture
MidMarketMcLovin
98.9