利润兴趣
霍迪小队。首先 - 长时间没有帖子。最近,我通过提出2012年评论的人的身份使我想起了我的会员资格,我受到了启发。
我最近收到了一个VC/PEEsque基金(由大型PE商店)向我保证X%“利润”,并引用“您的利润单位奖励协议”。这对他们来说是一项新事业,我被告知他们还没有达成协议。因此,我在这里评估此优惠而无需看到文档。我被要求提交然后收到细节。
Questions:
- Is this fishy / deceptive? Should I run?
- Do I demand to see the document prior to resigning my current role?
- Will this agreement apply to the other members of the fund and therefore will be written favorably e.g. nothing to worry about?
我喜欢团队和报价,只是感到困惑。
Comments (7)
1) Not fishy on its face. Aligns incentives. Good for you if the fund is expecting to be cash flow positive early on
2) Absolutely yes. Not unreasonable to do so
3)与2相关。
感谢您的答复,非常有帮助!我正在阅读您的回答,因为不,他们不是很腥,但仍然可以预料,我要求在辞职之前看到协议。他们可能会有些不高兴,因为这可能会延迟我的开始日期,但不会被视为令人反感。
Furthermore, I have some follow-up asks on comp. Should I hold on to these until I receive the agreement and then ask, or request all these things at once?
听起来您可以在整体综合问题中提出协议问题。不能责怪默认的“书面上的一切”方法。
另外,我想您在PI协议中说,我希望看看我是否会被“服从”吗?
您可以期望将股东服从于股东,但要寻找有关GP的能力来做他们的事情的术语want with free cash flowthat otherwise could be distributed to PIU holders.
I don't know how common it is for PI holders to receive distributions outside of a liquidity event - that's always been the case in my experience. Assuming that it's a private company, by their nature, a liquidity event that implies an需要权益价值确定PI是否在金钱中。
我来自山谷,小先生,他们会带您像爸爸做的那样。
Ut doloremque ea quo esse. Possimus ut nesciunt ratione omnis. At in quae beatae deleniti. Vitae consequuntur qui quae ut ratione est quas. Blanditiis aut nisi qui esse assumenda quibusdam. Sunt omnis cupiditate quia maiores quia.
Quia doloremque tempora minus quae praesentium. Et culpa illo minima magni est.
查看所有评论 - 100%免费
WSO取决于每个人都知道某事时能够参与进来。解锁您的电子邮件并获得奖金:6 financial modeling lessons free($199 value)
或者Want toUnlock通过签署您的社交帐户?