芝加哥展位,凯洛格(Kellogg)代表
Hi guys,
I've been recently accepted into Chicago Booth and wanted to find out its rep among the Ibanking community. I have worked as an engineer and want to transition into an associate role at an I-bank. Will Booth's name help me get my foot into the door as a career switcher, considering how many laid off bankers are out there?
我也被凯洛格(Kellogg)接受了,但听说它在华尔街没有受到尊重。我对凯洛格(Kellogg)的论点是,I-Banking竞争较少(只有10-15%的银行业务),因此从凯洛格(Kellogg)闯入银行可能会更容易。
Finally, how does Columbia stack up to these two in terms of rep?
只是我的直觉在这里:哈佛/沃顿酒店>芝加哥/哥伦比亚>凯洛格
任何建议/技巧都非常感谢。
谢谢!
评论 (26)
芝加哥展位是一个很棒的B学校
芝加哥摊位很烂...只有商务周喜欢那些小丑
“芝加哥摊位很烂……只有商务周喜欢那些小丑” - 有人没有被接受
我认为这是一个公平的评估。有些人可能主要基于位置,与哥伦比亚相比,哥伦比亚略有优势。尽管这似乎是肤浅的,但对于较小的银行来说,这可能是招聘或不招募之间的区别。我怀疑Perella Weinberg或者穆利斯去芝加哥旅行(虽然我可能错了)。如果您专注于较大的银行,那么我认为没有区别。他们都因其学者,尤其是强大的财务计划而受到尊重。
I don't know much about Kellogg, but the question to ask is "Do the banks recruit on campus?" and if so, which ones. My guess is the stats say more about how many banks come to recruit rather than how many students are trying to get into banking.
Finally, congrats on both of the acceptances!
From what I've heard, Northwestern isn't known for finance so much as it is for marketing. From a purely academic, intellectual perspective, Chicago might be the best school in the country to learn finance.
chicago is a finance powerhouse, though my impression is that it has a more intellectual atmosphere than wharton (ie - students actually care about what they learn in class).
我看到更多的芝加哥明矾贸易在对冲基金中,但是P/E有很多ibd,所以您将有很多机会。
have you considered trading or a more market-oriented role? an engineering background with a uchicagoMBA尽管这取决于约2年的就业市场外观,但会让您非常理想。
您能解释一下“面向市场的角色”的恰恰是什么。请记住,我是一名纯工程师,没有财务背景:)
芝加哥GSB(讨厌这个名字的展位)在谈到方面是明显的赢家IBD。
这是全部MBA而不是本科?
您为什么要将本科学校与凯洛格(Kellogg)这样的商学院进行比较?
编辑:双帖子。
Endlessrain,您是说芝加哥也是对哥伦比亚的冠军?
听起来像是在凯洛格(Kellogg)获得面试老虎机的竞争较少,这并不能弥补芝加哥展位的Ibanking Rep优势。非常感谢!
我于2008年从芝加哥毕业,进入英石。But I know lots of people who went intoIB来自两所学校。当我在那里时,降落的几率IB在ABB两所学校的公司都是一样的。两者都招募的所有主要公司都有很强IB校园小组帮助招聘等。几乎所有在招聘中玩游戏的优秀候选人都获得了多个优惠。当然,这是2006年秋天,所以我不确定现在有多不同。在边缘,毫米芝加哥或哥伦比亚的商店可能会更容易,但是凯洛格的毕业生往往对自己有帮助。
竞争较少的争论几乎没有优点。首先,银行倾向于根据他们喜欢的招聘人员喜欢多少人来调整封闭列表的规模,因此它可以与兴趣成正比。另外,如果您不足以进入芝加哥的封闭列表,那么您也不会从任何其他学校获得报价。
on the academic side, coming from a non-finance background, as I was, Chicago will offer you the best education possible. You can make a much more rigorous and thorough schedule for yourself than you can at kellogg, columbia, wharton, etc. And after meeting my fellow associates from other top schools I stand by this comment 100%.
甚至不是问题。在我的即将到来的同事班上认识并认识了几个芝加哥毕业生BB,所有聪明的人,训练有素。无论出于何种原因,从来没有遇到过凯洛格。当然,我去了英石so we were very finance-oriented, but still, I'd say Chicago hands down.
“芝加哥摊位很烂……只有商务周喜欢那些小丑” - 有人没有被接受”
是的,就是你。
”“芝加哥展位很烂……只有商业周才喜欢那些小丑” - 有人没有被接受”
是的,就是你。“
Philosphical Monkey,您让我想起了一个玩讨论板的孩子。建设性或关闭它。
But why shut it homie?
因为...
嘴巴=更多的唇部摩擦
Ah, I get it... if I am constructive he'll give me a loose BJ, and if I am not he'll give me a tight BJ. Strange fellow. But I can't complain.
感谢您的澄清,马库斯。
大概贸易,对冲资金,以及Asset Management- 大多数情况下,任何与证券的交易都取决于市场。
这些工作非常注重量子,因此您的工程背景非常可取。
You're definitely smart, as an engineer and getting into bschools, but you might want to research the industry before deciding you want to transition into banking.
感谢您的澄清。尚未研究该方面。我有一个朋友嘛这听起来很有趣,所以这就是我最初倾向于的。在芝加哥布斯和凯洛格(Chicago Booth)和凯洛格(Kellogg)的最初2-3周中,银行几乎每天都会在几个星期内进行演讲。也许我会在那几周内找到自己的利基市场。
Vel voluptas quaerat nemo exercitationem qui. Et aliquid natus consequatur laborum et quo. Ducimus neque et est et. Qui quis ut non maiores. Dolorem necessitatibus facere cum aut aliquam repudiandae. Cupiditate sint iste ad ipsum neque iusto aut eligendi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus:6财务建模课程免费($ 199的价值)
或者想要开锁经过signing in with your social account?
后面的eius cumque aspernaturest。quidemut eveliet eeliquam quis tenetur penetur locudiandae similique。EIUS坐着Vel Voluptas。Magnam Quisquam cistidunt est sed et eos。
id saepe aspernatur sed iste。练习emem ipsio ipsa quibusdam cum sint。非代替静脉曲张qui id。
Amet porro aut saepe autem ut iure. Dolores quia saepe commodi ex sit aliquid perspiciatis. Id alias dolor earum officiis modi.
Sunt voluptatem fuga rem doloribus fuga. Ut voluptate aspernatur delectus ut et maxime. Molestiae eaque magnam sit itaque eligendi.
预览和下载评论作为图像
您可以使用浏览器的上下文菜单下载此屏幕截图或复制到剪贴板