董事会自由主义者,您想在2024年成为民主党候选人?
[Hostility free thread]
Recent polling has indicated that a significant (~a third or so) of Democrats want a different candidate in 2024. Let's just assume that Kamala is off the table unless the party power brokers all start doing crack.
Who would you want in 2024? Biden again, or would you prefer it if he declined to run?
评论 (26)
拜登把我们带出了阿富汗,使我们更好的基础设施(他的前任都失败了),并为我们提供了一项强大的支出法案,使我们脱离了库维德。如果我们在育儿,带薪休假和毒品价格谈判方面取得了良好的进步,那将是第一年的伟大,这是多年来最好的。
(这里的小本·夏皮罗斯(Ben Shapiros)会哭泣通货膨胀,但会忽略每个国家拥有它的事实,而特朗普则签署了2.3万亿美元的税收削减。但是您知道什么?工人的短缺是一件好事。工资。上帝知道上帝知道多长时间,这个国家的工人权利是个玩笑。现在是工人占上风的时候了,公司将不得不更好地对待工人。)
So I say keep him, assuming he's still healthy enough. We need someone who can work with moderate and progressive politicians to get things done.
Would you not prefer if he declined to run for "age and health" reasons and instead have someone young and spry step in? (Pete Buttigieg for example)
The Afghanistan withdrawal and fallout was so viscerally shocking that otherwise friendly media dropped the script and shit on the administration. And you're severely understating the current supply chain crisis and inflation issues - normal apolitical people are talking about this constantly. People feel it. Progressives are pissed because BBB looks like it might not pass in the wake of the recent elections and inflation at a 30 year high. When you say "if he's healthy enough"... he's arguably not healthy enough现在。右翼媒体目前在讨论黑人联赛时说“黑人”,这并不是该剪辑中最令人震惊的部分。令人不安的是,他似乎完全摆脱了它,几乎连贯。您可以让他跳上药丸两个小时的辩论,他看起来很好,但是在总统四年中,您不能做到这一点。现在很糟糕,只会变得更糟。
I'm aiming to be non-partisan/ideological here - if I were in the shoes of a progressive Democrat or even a moderate Democrat I would probably be hoping that he doesn't run. There are surely people who would be more effective at public messaging, more effective at dealing with the various factions of the party, and more effective at pushing through a left wing agenda.
(出于同样的原因 - 虽然我对特朗普对党派的民粹主义并远离新保守主义表示了无限的赞赏,但我希望他不会在2024年跑步)
阿富汗是前三位总统的失败,他们在国家建设上花费了超过一万亿美元,最终拥有一个木偶州,即使没有美国士兵保存他们的情况,也无法持续一个月。相比之下,苏联政府崩溃后,苏联政府在阿富汗的政府绝不是在没有苏联军队的情况下持续3年。这可能不是很受欢迎的事情,但这是正确的事情。20年的时间太长了,无法被困在那个污水池中,而拜登就无法在没有部队激增的情况下赢得胜利,因此只要失去损失并离开就很有意义。
再一次,公司将需要对这个国家对待工人的方式进行一些更改,以结束这一问题。我们曾经有Teamsters Union,现在我们有“车轮上的汗水店”,是否缺少卡车司机的短缺?甚至是银行家JPMorganare quitting. That's supposed to be one of the best jobs in the country. If you think the Republicans who support 7.25$ an hour would be effective at all in stopping worker shortages, you're delusional.
Republicans have always been better at spreading their message, I don't deny that. We are having stock market records and the best labor market in our lifetime, Biden definitely needs to improve his message.
您是一个小丑drumpfy,可能是美国唯一仍然支持马铃薯的人。强大的支出法案使我们摆脱了库维德?真的吗?支出法案使我们脱离了库维德?在2020年全部残酷封锁之后,经济终于开放的事实吗?让我们离开了阿富汗?是的,他严重地将撤军炸了起来,留下了无助的美国人,军事装备和庞大的矿产储备,以便我们的敌人利用。至于通货膨胀,特朗普担任总统时没有通货膨胀。工资仍在上升。如果您认为现在的政府甚至具有遥不可及的能力,那么您将完全脱离现实。
You're utterly detached if you think that Build Back Better plan, which is fully paid for, will contribute to inflation, but Trump's 2.3 billion unpaid tax cuts won't.
为什么当支出使普通人受益时,为什么通货膨胀和债务只有问题?
And frankly, 20 years and a trillion dollars in Afghanistan is far too long. I'd rather not have kids dying over there to pay for college.
高级投资银行和私募股权基金的精英从业人员教授的6个建模课程的300多个视频课程 - Excel建模 - 财务报表建模 - 并购建模 - LBO建模 - DCF - DCF和估值建模 - 全部包括 + 2巨额奖金。
354manbetx我温和,但欢迎Pete市长。如果拜登(Biden)或哈里斯(Harris)获得提名,我将投票共和党人,除非特朗普获得共和党提名。
He's ex-McKinsey so he享受管理咨询圈子。也就是说,他对操作和执行毫无意义。作为小城市市长,他没有荣耀自己。相反,他表明实施良好的政策实际上很难。也许运营美国运输部门会教他一些东西。
1. Pete Buttigieg。
哈佛教育的资深人士,他让我想起了奥巴马
2.迈克尔·本奈特
绝对他妈的爱上了政策的家伙,这个剪辑使我巩固了他
3. Cory Booker
same as Pete, just older and more experienced. obama 2012 vibes
。
。
。
。
。
。
9877。乔·拜登
上帝该死的人,你他妈的老了
。
。
。
。
323000000。卡马拉·哈里斯(Kamala Harris)
Holy fucking shit she's so annoying, and she's politically inept
好的候选人
。
Ratface Buttplug,比Kamala更糟。
Also lol at Limpdick saying that workers shortage is good while supporting a no borders immigration policy.
切勿与白痴讨论,首先他们将您拖到他们的水平上,然后以经验击败您。
不是民主党人,但我在社会上是非常自由的,在某些地区,政策变得更加自由(学生贷款在破产,教育改革和更多资金等方面的贷款等)。
当我仍然住在弗吉尼亚州时,不讨厌看到像马克·华纳这样的人是一位伟大的州长
不确定,但这是候选人的特征
1。Well educated
2.低于50
3.成功
4。Personable
5。Does not have to be a current politician
I'd love for a Buttigieg-style young, business-friendly, socially-liberal type. More pragmatists with a good heart, fewer ideologues or "hype" pols who like to own people on Twitter (looking at you, Trump and AOC)
Qui Id facilis nesciunt vel。自动Ullam Expedita Consectut Quidem EOS。Corporis esse ut Odit Sunt。
Dolorem nam illo itaque iusto. Velit maiores excepturi earum labore culpa quia optio. Dolores nihil dolore accusantium aut eveniet dicta maxime enim.
Aut登山士非Quia Quia。Similique quibusdam minima unde unlum ut aperiam。
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus:6财务建模课程免费($ 199的价值)
或者想要开锁经过signing in with your social account?
大批
预览和下载评论作为图像
您可以使用浏览器的上下文菜单下载此屏幕截图或复制到剪贴板